Court Votes to Dissolve Democrats


Amazing Thailand and the amazing ruthlessness of the establishment: within a day of Army Chief Anupong Paojinda calling for a dissolution of parliament (which I take it means no more crackdowns on his watch) and the Electoral Commission has apparently voted 4-1 to dissolve the Democrat Party for receiving an illegal donation and other charges (at least one other charge anyway – the reporting is not entirely clear).

The process is not automatic (well, not in law anyway) as the case is now passed to the Attorney General and then on to the Constitution Court. However, I think there is no need for me to spell out what this means.

So, Abhisit is finished and will presumably be banned for five years, along I guess with Suthep, Kasit (? do PAD coalition members also get banned) and whoever it is who passes for the brains behind the Democrat Party.

This would mean an election and another few months of faffing around with the relevant court still having the power to ban any successful party, if the court so decides (how many times can they do this without looking just a little bit, shall we say, presumptuous?).

That would be good for Anupong, who stands a chance of getting to his retirement with his various powers intact, so to speak. Any potential violence might be put off (unless the stories of the Prem v Watermelon coup/battles I mentioned earlier turn out to be true) but the ill-feeling will be stored up for explosions of anger later.

For the establishment, the system prevails – which is what the system and its key supporters most want.

Election for Governor of Bangkok


Anecdote is not evidence, of course, but Suvarnabhumi Airport seemed almost empty last night. Normally, the first of the three entries into the immigration section is crowded with farangs and the smart traveller (or me, whatever) sneaks off to the next entrance, where there are generally much fewer people. However, last night it was not necessary as there were vacant immigration people sitting around with nothing to do. The traffic was very light too. There was a report last week that tourist arrivals were 30% down on normal because of the PAD mob action. It takes the Tourism Authority a few months to collate figures and then naturally they will not publish them straight away – I imagine they will be concerned that they will miss their targets.

One thing that the light traffic does make clear is how many billboards there are on the streets advertising candidates for the Bangkok governor election. There has been very little about this in the English language press – perhaps there is more in the Thai language media but it seems very low key. There seem to be three main candidates, based on the advertising. The first is incumbent Apirak Kosayodhin, who is the Democrat candidate and who, based on his performance so far, is best described as ‘rarely seen.’ I am not sure what he offers apart from more of the same (i.e. very little) and the Democrats of course these days seem to have no policies or ideology at all, thanks to leader Abhisit Vejjajiva, who would have been forced to resign in just about any other country in the world based on his disastrous electoral record.

The second candidate is Chuwit the massage parlour baron – former baron, presumably. His pictures show him furiously (he is always shown as furious about something or other) searching for something, sometimes on the back of a motor bike taxi with the aid of binoculars. I assume this refers to his desire to search for and root out corruption wherever it might be found. He promised the same thing if he were elected to parliament but the torrent of tales he was going to tell about the rich and powerful somehow was stoppered at the source. Perhaps it was because revealing these secrets would compromise his own position and not just an act of flagrant hypocrisy.

A third candidate, number one as I recall (the two above were five and eight – they are numbered to make it easier for people to vote, especially those who cannot read well) offers ‘t-zone for teens.’ It is not clear to me what that is or why anyone would vote for it but there you are. No doubt he means well.

As I recall, the TV personality and occasional Bangkok Post columnist Nattakorn (what was his surname?) was going to run as a kind of underground candidate, relying largely on internet campaigning. Since he was the most acute Thai columnist by quite some distance, it is to be hoped that he loses and returns to his writing and broadcasting.

The election is due on October 5th. Let us see if more information emerges in the meantime.